Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus

Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash was 15.4% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
15.4%
Change on year
up 1.9%
World rank
1st
of 26 countries
All-time high
22.3%
in 2016
All-time low
6.4%
in 2008
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus, 2008–2019

51015202008201320192008: 6.4 preT2009: 7.1 preT2010: 7.1 preT2012: 8 preT2013: 12 preT2014: 14.7 preT2015: 14.4 preT2016: 22.3 preT2017: 12.2 preT2018: 15.1 preT2019: 15.4 preT

Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus is 15.4%, measured in 2019.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.9% on the previous year and up 117.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus peaked at 22.3% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 6.4%, in 2008.

That places Belarus 1st out of 26 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT) in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year preT Change
2008 6.4%
2009 7.1% +9.8%
2010 7.1% +0.8%
2012 8.0% +11.5%
2013 12.0% +50.2%
2014 14.7% +23.0%
2015 14.4% -2.1%
2016 22.3% +54.9%
2017 12.2% -45.2%
2018 15.1% +23.5%
2019 15.4% +1.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 6.8% 6.4% 7.1% 2
2010s 13.5% 7.1% 22.3% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 2 Poland 14.8% compare
  2. 3 Kosovo 13.8% compare
  3. 3 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 13.8% compare

See the full ranking of 26 places →

More work & labour data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus?
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus was 15.4% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 22.3% in 2016.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 6.4% in 2008.
How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
Belarus ranks 1st out of 26 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 117.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-pret/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-pret/belarus/">Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT)
Unit
preT
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
26 places, 222 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group