Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private in Peru

Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private was 14.5% in 2022. ▬ Flat

Latest (2022)
14.5%
Change on year
up 3.5%
World rank
24th
of 27 countries
All-time high
19.1%
in 2009
All-time low
11.3%
in 2014
Years of data
15
2008–2022

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private in Peru, 2008–2022

051015202008201520222008: 16.32009: 19.12010: 12.42011: 12.22012: 12.52013: 152014: 11.32015: 12.82016: 15.52017: 13.92018: 14.72019: 16.22020: 13.92021: 14.12022: 14.5

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2022, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private in Peru stood at 14.5%.

The figure is up 3.5% on the previous year and up 16.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private in Peru peaked at 19.1% in 2009 and was at its lowest, 11.3%, in 2014.

That places Peru 24th out of 27 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private in Peru, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers in Peru, 2008 to 2022.
Year Value Change
2008 16.3%
2009 19.1% +17.6%
2010 12.4% -35.2%
2011 12.2% -1.8%
2012 12.5% +2.5%
2013 15.0% +20.2%
2014 11.3% -24.4%
2015 12.8% +13.3%
2016 15.5% +20.9%
2017 13.9% -10.5%
2018 14.7% +5.6%
2019 16.2% +10.5%
2020 13.9% -14.3%
2021 14.1% +1.1%
2022 14.5% +3.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 17.7% 16.3% 19.1% 2
2010s 13.7% 11.3% 16.2% 10
2020s 14.2% 13.9% 14.5% 3

Countries ranked near Peru

  1. 21 El Salvador 17.3% compare
  2. 22 Costa Rica 16.9% compare
  3. 23 Chile 15.8% compare
  4. 25 Paraguay 12.5% compare
  5. 26 Uruguay 9.7% compare
  6. 27 Burkina Faso 6.2% compare

See the full ranking of 27 places →

More work & labour data for Peru

All data for Peru →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private in Peru?
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private in Peru was 14.5% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private recorded in Peru?
The highest recorded value was 19.1% in 2009.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private recorded in Peru?
The lowest recorded value was 11.3% in 2014.
How does Peru rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private?
Peru ranks 24th out of 27 countries with data for 2022.
Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private rising or falling in Peru?
Over the last ten years it is up 16.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Peru data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private in Peru. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers/peru/">Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private in Peru</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 266 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group