Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private in Mongolia

Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private was 59.7% in 2020. ▲ Rising

Latest (2020)
59.7%
Change on year
up 52.4%
World rank
7th
of 27 countries
All-time high
59.7%
in 2020
All-time low
21.8%
in 2012
Years of data
9
2007–2020

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private in Mongolia, 2007–2020

02040602007201320202007: 442009: 39.32010: 302011: 252012: 21.82014: 35.62016: 33.62018: 39.22020: 59.7

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2020, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private in Mongolia stood at 59.7%. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

The figure is up 52.4% on the previous year and up 98.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private in Mongolia peaked at 59.7% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 21.8%, in 2012.

That places Mongolia 7th out of 27 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the top quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private in Mongolia, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban in Mongolia, 2007 to 2020.
Year Value Change
2007 44.0%
2009 39.3% -10.8%
2010 30.0% -23.5%
2011 25.0% -16.7%
2012 21.8% -12.9%
2014 35.6% +63.6%
2016 33.6% -5.9%
2018 39.2% +16.8%
2020 59.7% +52.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 41.6% 39.3% 44.0% 2
2010s 30.9% 21.8% 39.2% 6
2020s 59.7% 59.7% 59.7% 1

Countries ranked near Mongolia

  1. 5 Armenia 67.0% compare
  2. 6 Georgia 65.9% compare
  3. 8 Republic of Moldova 57.4% compare
  4. 9 Pakistan 51.0% compare
  5. 10 Türkiye 48.3% compare

See the full ranking of 27 places →

More work & labour data for Mongolia

All data for Mongolia →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private in Mongolia?
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private in Mongolia was 59.7% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private recorded in Mongolia?
The highest recorded value was 59.7% in 2020.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private recorded in Mongolia?
The lowest recorded value was 21.8% in 2012.
How does Mongolia rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private?
Mongolia ranks 7th out of 27 countries with data for 2020.
Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private rising or falling in Mongolia?
Over the last ten years it is up 98.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Mongolia data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private in Mongolia. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers-urban/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers-urban/mongolia/">Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private in Mongolia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 259 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group