Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private was 75.5% in 2017. ▼ Falling

Latest (2017)
75.5%
World rank
3rd
of 27 countries
All-time high
91.4%
in 2006
All-time low
33.2%
in 2013
Years of data
5
2006–2017

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), 2006–2017

0204060801002006201120172006: 91.42011: 64.22012: 47.12013: 33.22017: 75.5

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2017, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) stood at 75.5%.

That represents a change of down 17.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) peaked at 91.4% in 2006 and was at its lowest, 33.2%, in 2013.

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 3rd of 27 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), 2006 to 2017.
Year Value Change
2006 91.4%
2011 64.2% -29.8%
2012 47.1% -26.7%
2013 33.2% -29.4%
2017 75.5% +127.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 91.4% 91.4% 91.4% 1
2010s 55.0% 33.2% 75.5% 4

Countries ranked near Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

  1. 1 Poland 17,646.6% compare
  2. 2 Kyrgyzstan 80.2% compare
  3. 3 Kosovo 75.5% compare
  4. 5 Armenia 67.0% compare
  5. 6 Georgia 65.9% compare

See the full ranking of 27 places →

More work & labour data for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

All data for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) was 75.5% in 2017, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private recorded in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
The highest recorded value was 91.4% in 2006.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private recorded in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
The lowest recorded value was 33.2% in 2013.
How does Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private?
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 3rd out of 27 countries with data for 2017.
Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private rising or falling in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
Over the last ten years it is down 17.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244). Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers-urban/kosovo-unscr-1244/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers-urban/kosovo-unscr-1244/">Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 259 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group