Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Panama

Panama: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers was 8.8% in 2023. ▬ Flat

Latest (2023)
8.8%
Change on year
down 9.2%
World rank
28th
of 31 countries
All-time high
11.1%
in 2015
All-time low
8.3%
in 2008
Years of data
14
2008–2023

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Panama, 2008–2023

02.557.5102008201520232008: 8.32009: 8.82010: 9.92011: 9.42012: 8.72013: 9.22014: 9.32015: 11.12016: 10.52017: 10.42018: 9.22019: 8.82021: 9.62023: 8.8

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Panama recorded 8.8% for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in 2023.

The figure is down 9.2% on the previous year and down 5.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Panama peaked at 11.1% in 2015 and was at its lowest, 8.3%, in 2008.

Panama ranks 28th of 31 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Panama, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Panama, 2008 to 2023.
Year Value Change
2008 8.3%
2009 8.8% +5.5%
2010 9.9% +12.6%
2011 9.4% -5.1%
2012 8.7% -7.5%
2013 9.2% +6.3%
2014 9.3% +0.4%
2015 11.1% +19.9%
2016 10.5% -5.4%
2017 10.4% -1.4%
2018 9.2% -11.0%
2019 8.8% -4.7%
2021 9.6% +9.7%
2023 8.8% -9.2%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 8.6% 8.3% 8.8% 2
2010s 9.6% 8.7% 11.1% 10
2020s 9.2% 8.8% 9.6% 2

Countries ranked near Panama

  1. 25 Mexico 12.7% compare
  2. 26 Belarus 10.1% compare
  3. 27 Ecuador 9.8% compare
  4. 29 El Salvador 8.6% compare
  5. 30 Malawi 7.1% compare
  6. 31 Burkina Faso 4.8% compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More work & labour data for Panama

All data for Panama →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Panama?
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Panama was 8.8% in 2023, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Panama?
The highest recorded value was 11.1% in 2015.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Panama?
The lowest recorded value was 8.3% in 2008.
How does Panama rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
Panama ranks 28th out of 31 countries with data for 2023.
Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers rising or falling in Panama?
Over the last ten years it is down 5.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Panama data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Panama. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-domestic-private-transfers/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-domestic-private-transfers/panama/">Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Panama</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 318 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group