Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Ecuador
Ecuador: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers was 11.1% in 2022. ▼ Falling
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Ecuador, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Ecuador recorded 11.1% for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in 2022.
That represents a change of up 9.3% on the previous year and down 58.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Ecuador peaked at 28.3% in 2010 and was at its lowest, 10.1%, in 2021.
Ecuador ranks 26th of 31 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 21.1% | — |
| 2010 | 28.3% | +34.4% |
| 2011 | 25.6% | -9.8% |
| 2012 | 26.7% | +4.4% |
| 2014 | 14.8% | -44.5% |
| 2015 | 14.0% | -5.5% |
| 2016 | 13.3% | -4.6% |
| 2017 | 11.7% | -11.9% |
| 2018 | 13.2% | +12.2% |
| 2019 | 10.5% | -20.2% |
| 2020 | 12.2% | +15.7% |
| 2021 | 10.1% | -16.7% |
| 2022 | 11.1% | +9.3% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 11.1% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 18.3%, 60% of the median. (19 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 11.1% is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 13.7%, 81% of the median. (15 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.1% | 21.1% | 21.1% | 1 |
| 2010s | 17.6% | 10.5% | 28.3% | 9 |
| 2020s | 11.1% | 10.1% | 12.2% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More work & labour data for Ecuador
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.578 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.567 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.589 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.04 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.13 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 17,174 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 5,794 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,543 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,549 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,092 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Ecuador?
- Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Ecuador was 11.1% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 28.3% in 2010.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 10.1% in 2021.
- How does Ecuador rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
- Ecuador ranks 26th out of 31 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 58.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group