Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Mongolia

Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers was 18.3% in 2020. ▲ Rising

Latest (2020)
18.3%
Change on year
up 8.9%
World rank
12th
of 30 countries
All-time high
21.8%
in 2016
All-time low
9.6%
in 2010
Years of data
9
2007–2020

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Mongolia, 2007–2020

051015202007201320202007: 162009: 14.92010: 9.62011: 102012: 12.32014: 16.92016: 21.82018: 16.82020: 18.3

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Mongolia recorded 18.3% for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in 2020.

The figure is up 8.9% on the previous year and up 91.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Mongolia peaked at 21.8% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 9.6%, in 2010.

Mongolia ranks 12th of 30 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Mongolia, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural in Mongolia, 2007 to 2020.
Year Value Change
2007 16.0%
2009 14.9% -6.9%
2010 9.6% -36.0%
2011 10.0% +4.3%
2012 12.3% +22.8%
2014 16.9% +37.6%
2016 21.8% +29.4%
2018 16.8% -23.0%
2020 18.3% +8.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 15.5% 14.9% 16.0% 2
2010s 14.6% 9.6% 21.8% 6
2020s 18.3% 18.3% 18.3% 1

Countries ranked near Mongolia

  1. 9 Honduras 23.9% compare
  2. 10 Dominican Republic 20.7% compare
  3. 11 Pakistan 20.3% compare
  4. 13 Costa Rica 17.9% compare
  5. 14 Paraguay 17.9% compare
  6. 15 Colombia 17.8% compare

See the full ranking of 30 places →

More work & labour data for Mongolia

All data for Mongolia →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Mongolia?
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Mongolia was 18.3% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Mongolia?
The highest recorded value was 21.8% in 2016.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Mongolia?
The lowest recorded value was 9.6% in 2010.
How does Mongolia rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
Mongolia ranks 12th out of 30 countries with data for 2020.
Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers rising or falling in Mongolia?
Over the last ten years it is up 91.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Mongolia data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Mongolia. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-domestic-private-transfers-rural/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-domestic-private-transfers-rural/mongolia/">Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Mongolia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
30 places, 295 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group