Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Ecuador
Ecuador: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and was 27.3% in 2022. ▼ Falling
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Ecuador, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and in Ecuador is 27.3%, measured in 2022.
The figure is down 6.0% on the previous year and down 0.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and in Ecuador peaked at 34.2% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 17.2%, in 2020.
That places Ecuador 23rd out of 36 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 24.1% | — |
| 2010 | 32.5% | +34.9% |
| 2011 | 30.2% | -7.2% |
| 2012 | 27.3% | -9.6% |
| 2014 | 22.9% | -16.2% |
| 2015 | 23.8% | +3.9% |
| 2016 | 34.2% | +44.1% |
| 2017 | 23.9% | -30.2% |
| 2018 | 26.7% | +11.9% |
| 2019 | 28.4% | +6.2% |
| 2020 | 17.2% | -39.3% |
| 2021 | 29.0% | +68.3% |
| 2022 | 27.3% | -6.0% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 27.3% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 32.1%, 85% of the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 27.3% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 24.0%, 1.1× the median. (15 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.1% | 24.1% | 24.1% | 1 |
| 2010s | 27.8% | 22.9% | 34.2% | 9 |
| 2020s | 24.5% | 17.2% | 29.0% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More work & labour data for Ecuador
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.578 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.567 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.589 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.04 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.13 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 17,174 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 5,794 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,543 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,549 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,092 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and in Ecuador?
- Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and in Ecuador was 27.3% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 34.2% in 2016.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 17.2% in 2020.
- How does Ecuador rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Ecuador ranks 23rd out of 36 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 0.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group