Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Mongolia
Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and was 32.9% in 2020. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Mongolia, 2007–2020
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and in Mongolia is 32.9%, measured in 2020. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
The figure is up 32.9% on the previous year and up 100.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and in Mongolia peaked at 32.9% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 16.5%, in 2010.
That places Mongolia 17th out of 36 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the middle of the range.
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Mongolia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 16.9% | — |
| 2009 | 18.5% | +9.2% |
| 2010 | 16.5% | -11.0% |
| 2011 | 22.7% | +38.0% |
| 2012 | 22.6% | -0.3% |
| 2014 | 18.9% | -16.6% |
| 2016 | 25.7% | +36.3% |
| 2018 | 24.8% | -3.6% |
| 2020 | 32.9% | +32.9% |
Mongolia compared with similar countries
- Mongolia's 32.9% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 32.9%, 1.0× the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.7% | 16.9% | 18.5% | 2 |
| 2010s | 21.9% | 16.5% | 25.7% | 6 |
| 2020s | 32.9% | 32.9% | 32.9% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Mongolia
- 14 Kyrgyzstan 38.1% compare
- 15 Ukraine 37.4% compare
- 16 Armenia 35.6% compare
- 18 Kosovo 27.6% compare
- 18 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 27.6% compare
- 20 Costa Rica 26.6% compare
More work & labour data for Mongolia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.1039 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.1076 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.0999 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.07 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.05 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 3,167 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 908.11 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,756 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,763 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 5,519 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and in Mongolia?
- Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and in Mongolia was 32.9% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Mongolia?
- The highest recorded value was 32.9% in 2020.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Mongolia?
- The lowest recorded value was 16.5% in 2010.
- How does Mongolia rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Mongolia ranks 17th out of 36 countries with data for 2020.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and rising or falling in Mongolia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 100.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Mongolia data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group