Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Ecuador
Ecuador: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and was 25.9% in 2022. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Ecuador, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
In 2022, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and in Ecuador stood at 25.9%.
That represents a change of up 6.8% on the previous year and up 10.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and in Ecuador peaked at 33.7% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 16.1%, in 2020.
Ecuador ranks 18th of 37 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 13 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 19.4% | — |
| 2010 | 24.3% | +25.0% |
| 2011 | 24.8% | +2.3% |
| 2012 | 23.5% | -5.2% |
| 2014 | 19.7% | -16.2% |
| 2015 | 22.0% | +11.3% |
| 2016 | 33.7% | +53.4% |
| 2017 | 23.3% | -30.8% |
| 2018 | 26.3% | +12.6% |
| 2019 | 26.9% | +2.4% |
| 2020 | 16.1% | -40.2% |
| 2021 | 24.2% | +50.6% |
| 2022 | 25.9% | +6.8% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 25.9% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 25.9%, 100% of the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 25.9% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 19.1%, 1.4× the median. (15 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.4% | 19.4% | 19.4% | 1 |
| 2010s | 25.0% | 19.7% | 33.7% | 9 |
| 2020s | 22.1% | 16.1% | 25.9% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More work & labour data for Ecuador
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.578 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.567 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.589 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.04 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.13 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 17,174 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 5,794 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,543 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,549 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,092 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and in Ecuador?
- Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and in Ecuador was 25.9% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 33.7% in 2016.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 16.1% in 2020.
- How does Ecuador rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Ecuador ranks 18th out of 37 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 10.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group