Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Belarus
Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and was 33.1% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and in Belarus stood at 33.1%.
The figure is up 5.1% on the previous year and up 53.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and in Belarus peaked at 38.9% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 21.5%, in 2009.
Belarus ranks 12th of 37 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Belarus, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 25.4% | — |
| 2009 | 21.5% | -15.4% |
| 2010 | 23.2% | +7.8% |
| 2012 | 25.8% | +11.1% |
| 2013 | 29.7% | +15.3% |
| 2014 | 32.5% | +9.4% |
| 2015 | 34.2% | +5.1% |
| 2016 | 38.9% | +14.0% |
| 2017 | 34.5% | -11.5% |
| 2018 | 31.5% | -8.6% |
| 2019 | 33.1% | +5.1% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 33.1% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 25.9%, 1.3× the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 33.1% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 32.9%, 1.0× the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.5% | 21.5% | 25.4% | 2 |
| 2010s | 31.5% | 23.2% | 38.9% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 9 Costa Rica 34.7% compare
- 10 Argentina 34.2% compare
- 11 Kyrgyzstan 33.6% compare
- 13 Republic of Moldova 32.8% compare
- 14 Romania 31.5% compare
- 15 Armenia 30.4% compare
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and in Belarus?
- Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and in Belarus was 33.1% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 38.9% in 2016.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 21.5% in 2009.
- How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Belarus ranks 12th out of 37 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 53.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group