Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Serbia
Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural was 42.3% in 2022. ▬ Flat
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Serbia, 2007–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Serbia is 42.3%, measured in 2022.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 14.4% on the previous year and down 29.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Serbia peaked at 60.0% in 2013 and was at its lowest, 40.0%, in 2015.
That places Serbia 15th out of 31 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Serbia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 42.3% | — |
| 2010 | 50.6% | +19.8% |
| 2013 | 60.0% | +18.5% |
| 2015 | 40.0% | -33.4% |
| 2018 | 49.5% | +23.8% |
| 2019 | 46.0% | -7.1% |
| 2021 | 49.4% | +7.5% |
| 2022 | 42.3% | -14.4% |
Serbia compared with similar countries
- Serbia's 42.3% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 43.4%, 98% of the median. (20 countries reporting)
- Serbia's 42.3% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 48.5%, 87% of the median. (11 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.3% | 42.3% | 42.3% | 1 |
| 2010s | 49.2% | 40.0% | 60.0% | 5 |
| 2020s | 45.9% | 42.3% | 49.4% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Serbia
- 12 Republic of Moldova 48.5% compare
- 13 Sri Lanka 43.6% compare
- 14 Dominican Republic 43.2% compare
- 16 Chile 42.1% compare
- 17 Viet Nam 41.2% compare
- 18 Costa Rica 41.2% compare
More work & labour data for Serbia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.7737 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.7205 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.8268 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.14 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.1128 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 5,121 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 2,326 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,850 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,852 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 3,702 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Serbia?
- Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Serbia was 42.3% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural recorded in Serbia?
- The highest recorded value was 60.0% in 2013.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural recorded in Serbia?
- The lowest recorded value was 40.0% in 2015.
- How does Serbia rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Serbia ranks 15th out of 31 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural rising or falling in Serbia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 29.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Serbia data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group