Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Mexico
Mexico: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural was 27.2% in 2022. ▬ Flat
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Mexico, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Mexico is 27.2%, measured in 2022.
That represents a change of down 10.0% on the previous year and up 18.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Mexico peaked at 31.1% in 2010 and was at its lowest, 23.0%, in 2012.
Mexico ranks 29th of 31 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Mexico, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 28.9% | — |
| 2010 | 31.1% | +7.4% |
| 2012 | 23.0% | -26.0% |
| 2014 | 24.9% | +8.5% |
| 2016 | 30.9% | +23.9% |
| 2018 | 26.8% | -13.3% |
| 2020 | 30.2% | +12.8% |
| 2022 | 27.2% | -10.0% |
Mexico compared with similar countries
- Mexico's 27.2% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 43.4%, 63% of the median. (20 countries reporting)
- Mexico's 27.2% is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 40.3%, 67% of the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.9% | 28.9% | 28.9% | 1 |
| 2010s | 27.3% | 23.0% | 31.1% | 5 |
| 2020s | 28.7% | 27.2% | 30.2% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Mexico
- 26 Armenia 32.4% compare
- 27 Kosovo 27.4% compare
- 27 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 27.4% compare
- 30 Ecuador 26.0% compare
- 31 El Salvador 15.0% compare
More work & labour data for Mexico
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.5786 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.5539 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.6038 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.41 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.5363 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 144,910 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 19,369 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 65,616 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 64,633 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 130,249 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Mexico?
- Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Mexico was 27.2% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural recorded in Mexico?
- The highest recorded value was 31.1% in 2010.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural recorded in Mexico?
- The lowest recorded value was 23.0% in 2012.
- How does Mexico rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Mexico ranks 29th out of 31 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural rising or falling in Mexico?
- Over the last ten years it is up 18.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Mexico data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group