Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus

Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash was 24.4% in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
24.4%
Change on year
up 7.3%
World rank
4th
of 26 countries
All-time high
81.8%
in 2016
All-time low
9.9%
in 2008
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus, 2008–2019

0204060802008201320192008: 9.92009: 10.32010: 11.62012: 13.62013: 19.12014: 21.82015: 22.72016: 81.82017: 20.92018: 22.82019: 24.4

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus stood at 24.4%.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 7.3% on the previous year and up 136.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus peaked at 81.8% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 9.9%, in 2008.

Belarus ranks 4th of 26 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 9.9%
2009 10.3% +4.5%
2010 11.6% +12.5%
2012 13.6% +17.5%
2013 19.1% +39.9%
2014 21.8% +14.4%
2015 22.7% +3.8%
2016 81.8% +261.0%
2017 20.9% -74.5%
2018 22.8% +9.1%
2019 24.4% +7.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 10.1% 9.9% 10.3% 2
2010s 26.5% 11.6% 81.8% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 1 Armenia 27.0% compare
  2. 2 Kosovo 26.0% compare
  3. 2 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 26.0% compare
  4. 5 Poland 21.7% compare
  5. 6 Georgia 21.5% compare
  6. 7 Serbia 18.0% compare

See the full ranking of 26 places →

More work & labour data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus?
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus was 24.4% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 81.8% in 2016.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 9.9% in 2008.
How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
Belarus ranks 4th out of 26 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 136.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers/belarus/">Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
26 places, 222 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group