Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus

Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash was 22.9% in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
22.9%
Change on year
up 2.4%
World rank
2nd
of 25 countries
All-time high
77.3%
in 2016
All-time low
7.9%
in 2008
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus, 2008–2019

0204060802008201320192008: 7.92009: 9.82010: 9.92012: 12.82013: 18.82014: 20.32015: 19.12016: 77.32017: 20.52018: 22.42019: 22.9

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Belarus recorded 22.9% for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in 2019.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.4% on the previous year and up 132.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus peaked at 77.3% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 7.9%, in 2008.

Belarus ranks 2nd of 25 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 7.9%
2009 9.8% +25.4%
2010 9.9% +0.2%
2012 12.8% +29.7%
2013 18.8% +46.9%
2014 20.3% +7.8%
2015 19.1% -5.9%
2016 77.3% +305.2%
2017 20.5% -73.5%
2018 22.4% +9.2%
2019 22.9% +2.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 8.9% 7.9% 9.8% 2
2010s 24.9% 9.9% 77.3% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 1 Armenia 23.4% compare
  2. 3 Serbia 21.5% compare
  3. 4 Poland 19.9% compare
  4. 5 Kosovo 19.5% compare
  5. 5 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 19.5% compare

See the full ranking of 25 places →

More work & labour data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus?
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus was 22.9% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 77.3% in 2016.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 7.9% in 2008.
How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
Belarus ranks 2nd out of 25 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 132.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-urban/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-urban/belarus/">Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
25 places, 211 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group