Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus

Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash was 16.9% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
16.9%
Change on year
down 5.6%
World rank
4th
of 26 countries
All-time high
29.7%
in 2016
All-time low
8.0%
in 2008
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus, 2008–2019

10152025302008201320192008: 8 preT2009: 10.9 preT2010: 10.4 preT2012: 11.4 preT2013: 16.3 preT2014: 17.5 preT2015: 19.2 preT2016: 29.7 preT2017: 18.5 preT2018: 17.9 preT2019: 16.9 preT

Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.

Analysis

In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus stood at 16.9%.

That represents a change of down 5.6% on the previous year and up 55.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus peaked at 29.7% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 8.0%, in 2008.

Belarus ranks 4th of 26 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT) in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year preT Change
2008 8.0%
2009 10.9% +35.1%
2010 10.4% -4.2%
2012 11.4% +9.3%
2013 16.3% +43.1%
2014 17.5% +7.6%
2015 19.2% +9.7%
2016 29.7% +54.3%
2017 18.5% -37.7%
2018 17.9% -2.9%
2019 16.9% -5.6%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 9.5% 8.0% 10.9% 2
2010s 17.5% 10.4% 29.7% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 1 Poland 20.9% compare
  2. 2 Georgia 17.8% compare
  3. 3 Armenia 17.0% compare
  4. 5 Kosovo 15.0% compare
  5. 5 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 15.0% compare
  6. 7 Kazakhstan 13.1% compare

See the full ranking of 26 places →

More work & labour data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus?
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus was 16.9% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 29.7% in 2016.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 8.0% in 2008.
How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
Belarus ranks 4th out of 26 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 55.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-pret/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-pret/belarus/">Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT)
Unit
preT
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
26 places, 222 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group