Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private was 47.5% in 2017. ▼ Falling

Latest (2017)
47.5%
World rank
9th
of 27 countries
All-time high
82.3%
in 2006
All-time low
34.9%
in 2012
Years of data
5
2006–2017

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), 2006–2017

0204060802006201120172006: 82.32011: 73.42012: 34.92013: 45.52017: 47.5

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2017, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) stood at 47.5%.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 42.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) peaked at 82.3% in 2006 and was at its lowest, 34.9%, in 2012.

That places Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 9th out of 27 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the middle of the range.

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), 2006 to 2017.
Year Value Change
2006 82.3%
2011 73.4% -10.8%
2012 34.9% -52.5%
2013 45.5% +30.3%
2017 47.5% +4.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 82.3% 82.3% 82.3% 1
2010s 50.3% 34.9% 73.4% 4

Countries ranked near Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

  1. 6 Pakistan 54.6% compare
  2. 7 Sri Lanka 49.9% compare
  3. 8 South Africa 48.5%
  4. 9 Kosovo 47.5% compare
  5. 11 Georgia 47.4% compare
  6. 12 Serbia 46.2% compare

See the full ranking of 27 places →

More work & labour data for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

All data for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) was 47.5% in 2017, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
The highest recorded value was 82.3% in 2006.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
The lowest recorded value was 34.9% in 2012.
How does Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private?
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 9th out of 27 countries with data for 2017.
Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private rising or falling in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
Over the last ten years it is down 42.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244). Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers/kosovo-unscr-1244/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers/kosovo-unscr-1244/">Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 266 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group