Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private in Georgia
Georgia: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private was 44.7% in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private in Georgia, 2011–2021
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Georgia recorded 44.7% for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private in 2021.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.5% on the previous year and down 84.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private in Georgia peaked at 295.3% in 2011 and was at its lowest, 29.1%, in 2012.
That places Georgia 8th out of 27 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private in Georgia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 295.3% | — |
| 2012 | 29.1% | -90.2% |
| 2013 | 43.2% | +48.6% |
| 2014 | 38.4% | -11.0% |
| 2015 | 48.1% | +25.2% |
| 2016 | 58.3% | +21.2% |
| 2017 | 57.6% | -1.3% |
| 2018 | 51.2% | -11.1% |
| 2019 | 57.0% | +11.3% |
| 2020 | 43.6% | -23.5% |
| 2021 | 44.7% | +2.5% |
Georgia compared with similar countries
- Georgia's 44.7% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 60.2%, 74% of the median. (8 countries reporting)
- Georgia's 44.7% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 28.1%, 1.6× the median. (17 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 75.4% | 29.1% | 295.3% | 9 |
| 2020s | 44.1% | 43.6% | 44.7% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Georgia
- 6 Pakistan 57.7% compare
- 7 Republic of Moldova 49.7% compare
- 9 Sri Lanka 40.7% compare
- 10 Mongolia 40.1% compare
- 11 South Africa 39.9% compare
More work & labour data for Georgia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.5749 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.5695 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.5795 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.16 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.0234 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 2,483 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 911.09 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,505 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,465 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 2,969 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private in Georgia?
- Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private in Georgia was 44.7% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Georgia?
- The highest recorded value was 295.3% in 2011.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Georgia?
- The lowest recorded value was 29.1% in 2012.
- How does Georgia rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private?
- Georgia ranks 8th out of 27 countries with data for 2021.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private rising or falling in Georgia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 84.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Georgia data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group