Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private in Republic of Moldova

Republic of Moldova: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private was 65.6% in 2018. ▼ Falling

Latest (2018)
65.6%
Change on year
up 9.0%
World rank
4th
of 27 countries
All-time high
73.0%
in 2010
All-time low
56.8%
in 2013
Years of data
5
2010–2018

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private in Republic of Moldova, 2010–2018

0204060802010201420182010: 73 preT2012: 64.9 preT2013: 56.8 preT2017: 60.2 preT2018: 65.6 preT

Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.

Analysis

In 2018, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private in Republic of Moldova stood at 65.6%.

That represents a change of up 9.0% on the previous year and down 10.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private in Republic of Moldova peaked at 73.0% in 2010 and was at its lowest, 56.8%, in 2013.

Republic of Moldova ranks 4th of 27 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private in Republic of Moldova, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers (preT) in Republic of Moldova, 2010 to 2018.
Year preT Change
2010 73.0%
2012 64.9% -11.2%
2013 56.8% -12.4%
2017 60.2% +5.9%
2018 65.6% +9.0%

Countries ranked near Republic of Moldova

  1. 1 Poland 24,523.8% compare
  2. 2 Armenia 122.6% compare
  3. 3 Kyrgyzstan 85.0% compare
  4. 5 Mongolia 57.2% compare
  5. 6 Pakistan 53.1% compare
  6. 7 Sri Lanka 51.5% compare

See the full ranking of 27 places →

More work & labour data for Republic of Moldova

All data for Republic of Moldova →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private in Republic of Moldova?
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private in Republic of Moldova was 65.6% in 2018, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Republic of Moldova?
The highest recorded value was 73.0% in 2010.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Republic of Moldova?
The lowest recorded value was 56.8% in 2013.
How does Republic of Moldova rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private?
Republic of Moldova ranks 4th out of 27 countries with data for 2018.
Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private rising or falling in Republic of Moldova?
Over the last ten years it is down 10.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Republic of Moldova data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private in Republic of Moldova. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers-pret/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers-pret/moldova/">Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private in Republic of Moldova</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers (preT)
Unit
preT
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 266 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group