Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private in Costa Rica
Costa Rica: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private was 22.0% in 2022. ▬ Flat
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private in Costa Rica, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
Costa Rica recorded 22.0% for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private in 2022.
The figure is up 41.3% on the previous year and up 38.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private in Costa Rica peaked at 37.0% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 15.5%, in 2010.
That places Costa Rica 18th out of 27 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private in Costa Rica, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 31.2% | — |
| 2010 | 15.5% | -50.5% |
| 2011 | 15.8% | +2.0% |
| 2012 | 15.9% | +1.1% |
| 2014 | 36.5% | +129.1% |
| 2015 | 16.1% | -55.9% |
| 2016 | 37.0% | +129.2% |
| 2017 | 23.7% | -36.0% |
| 2018 | 16.5% | -30.4% |
| 2019 | 31.8% | +92.9% |
| 2021 | 15.6% | -50.9% |
| 2022 | 22.0% | +41.3% |
Costa Rica compared with similar countries
- Costa Rica's 22.0% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 19.9%, 1.1× the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.2% | 31.2% | 31.2% | 1 |
| 2010s | 23.2% | 15.5% | 37.0% | 9 |
| 2020s | 18.8% | 15.6% | 22.0% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Costa Rica
- 15 Honduras 28.1% compare
- 16 Dominican Republic 25.3% compare
- 17 Ecuador 23.3% compare
- 19 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 20.4% compare
- 20 Türkiye 19.5% compare
- 21 El Salvador 19.5% compare
More work & labour data for Costa Rica
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.9965 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.9952 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.9977 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.61 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.29 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 5,205 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 569.35 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,908 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,868 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 3,776 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private in Costa Rica?
- Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private in Costa Rica was 22.0% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Costa Rica?
- The highest recorded value was 37.0% in 2016.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Costa Rica?
- The lowest recorded value was 15.5% in 2010.
- How does Costa Rica rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private?
- Costa Rica ranks 18th out of 27 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private rising or falling in Costa Rica?
- Over the last ten years it is up 38.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group