Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Belarus

Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and was 63.3% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
63.3%
Change on year
up 9.6%
World rank
2nd
of 37 countries
All-time high
80.0%
in 2016
All-time low
42.1%
in 2008
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Belarus, 2008–2019

0204060802008201320192008: 42.12009: 43.52010: 44.12012: 46.62013: 54.72014: 53.32015: 60.72016: 802017: 58.42018: 57.82019: 63.3

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Belarus recorded 63.3% for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in 2019.

That represents a change of up 9.6% on the previous year and up 45.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Belarus peaked at 80.0% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 42.1%, in 2008.

Belarus ranks 2nd of 37 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 42.1%
2009 43.5% +3.3%
2010 44.1% +1.4%
2012 46.6% +5.5%
2013 54.7% +17.4%
2014 53.3% -2.6%
2015 60.7% +14.1%
2016 80.0% +31.7%
2017 58.4% -26.9%
2018 57.8% -1.1%
2019 63.3% +9.6%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 42.8% 42.1% 43.5% 2
2010s 57.7% 44.1% 80.0% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 1 Poland 70.0% compare
  2. 3 South Africa 62.8% compare
  3. 4 Thailand 61.6% compare
  4. 5 Serbia 60.8% compare

See the full ranking of 37 places →

More work & labour data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Belarus?
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Belarus was 63.3% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 80.0% in 2016.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 42.1% in 2008.
How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
Belarus ranks 2nd out of 37 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 45.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-all-social-protection-and-labor/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-all-social-protection-and-labor/belarus/">Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
37 places, 372 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group