Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) … 3rd Protection Labor rural in Moldova

Moldova: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) … 3rd Protection Labor rural was 54.3% in 2018. ▲ Rising

Latest (2018)
54.3%
Change on year
up 11.1%
World rank
6th
of 36 countries
All-time high
54.3%
in 2018
All-time low
39.3%
in 2010
Years of data
5
2010–2018

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Moldova, 2010–2018

02040602010201420182010: 39.32012: 40.32013: 41.62017: 48.92018: 54.3

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Moldova recorded 54.3% for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in 2018. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of up 11.1% on the previous year and up 38.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Moldova peaked at 54.3% in 2018 and was at its lowest, 39.3%, in 2010.

That places Moldova 6th out of 36 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the top quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) … 3rd Protection Labor rural in Moldova, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural in Moldova, 2010 to 2018.
Year Value Change
2010 39.3% —
2012 40.3% +2.6%
2013 41.6% +3.1%
2017 48.9% +17.6%
2018 54.3% +11.1%

Moldova compared with similar countries

  • Moldova's 54.3% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 28.0%, 1.9× the median. (23 countries reporting)
  • Moldova's 54.3% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 47.1%, 1.2× the median. (12 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Moldova

  1. 3 Poland 65.7% compare
  2. 4 Romania 61.0% compare
  3. 5 Serbia 55.6% compare
  4. 7 Brazil 50.4% compare
  5. 8 Georgia 48.4% compare
  6. 9 Chile 46.0% compare

See the full ranking of 36 places →

More work & labour data for Moldova

All data for Moldova →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Moldova?
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Moldova was 54.3% in 2018, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Moldova?
The highest recorded value was 54.3% in 2018.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Moldova?
The lowest recorded value was 39.3% in 2010.
How does Moldova rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
Moldova ranks 6th out of 36 countries with data for 2018.
Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and rising or falling in Moldova?
Over the last ten years it is up 38.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Moldova data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Moldova. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-all-social-protection-and-labor-rural/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-all-social-protection-and-labor-rural/moldova/">Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Moldova</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 352 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group