Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Belarus

Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and was 74.7% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
74.7%
Change on year
up 20.9%
World rank
1st
of 36 countries
All-time high
100.3%
in 2016
All-time low
54.8%
in 2008
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Belarus, 2008–2019

02550751002008201320192008: 54.82009: 56.22010: 572012: 60.22013: 67.52014: 68.32015: 75.12016: 100.32017: 75.42018: 61.82019: 74.7

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Belarus recorded 74.7% for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in 2019.

The figure is up 20.9% on the previous year and up 32.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Belarus peaked at 100.3% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 54.8%, in 2008.

That places Belarus 1st out of 36 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 54.8%
2009 56.2% +2.6%
2010 57.0% +1.3%
2012 60.2% +5.8%
2013 67.5% +12.1%
2014 68.3% +1.2%
2015 75.1% +10.0%
2016 100.3% +33.5%
2017 75.4% -24.8%
2018 61.8% -18.1%
2019 74.7% +20.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 55.5% 54.8% 56.2% 2
2010s 71.1% 57.0% 100.3% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 2 South Africa 69.4% compare
  2. 3 Poland 65.7% compare
  3. 4 Romania 61.0% compare

See the full ranking of 36 places →

More work & labour data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Belarus?
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Belarus was 74.7% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 100.3% in 2016.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 54.8% in 2008.
How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
Belarus ranks 1st out of 36 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 32.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-all-social-protection-and-labor-rural/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-all-social-protection-and-labor-rural/belarus/">Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 352 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group