Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Ecuador
Ecuador: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and was 19.1% in 2022. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Ecuador, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
In 2022, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Ecuador stood at 19.1%.
That represents a change of down 7.6% on the previous year and up 0.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Ecuador peaked at 26.9% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 14.5%, in 2020.
That places Ecuador 26th out of 37 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 13 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 15.7% | — |
| 2010 | 19.3% | +22.5% |
| 2011 | 20.9% | +8.7% |
| 2012 | 19.0% | -9.4% |
| 2014 | 18.0% | -5.4% |
| 2015 | 18.3% | +1.9% |
| 2016 | 26.9% | +46.9% |
| 2017 | 17.9% | -33.3% |
| 2018 | 19.4% | +8.5% |
| 2019 | 22.5% | +15.7% |
| 2020 | 14.5% | -35.8% |
| 2021 | 20.7% | +43.2% |
| 2022 | 19.1% | -7.6% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 19.1% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 30.9%, 62% of the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 19.1% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 19.1%, 1.0× the median. (15 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.7% | 15.7% | 15.7% | 1 |
| 2010s | 20.2% | 17.9% | 26.9% | 9 |
| 2020s | 18.1% | 14.5% | 20.7% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More work & labour data for Ecuador
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.578 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.567 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.589 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.04 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.13 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 17,174 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 5,794 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,543 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,549 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,092 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Ecuador?
- Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Ecuador was 19.1% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 26.9% in 2016.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 14.5% in 2020.
- How does Ecuador rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Ecuador ranks 26th out of 37 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 0.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group