Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban in Poland
Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban was 111.1% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban in Poland is 111.1%, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 26.5% on the previous year and up 24.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban in Poland peaked at 111.1% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 84.4%, in 2007.
That places Poland 1st out of 34 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban in Poland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 85.6% | — |
| 2006 | 86.0% | +0.5% |
| 2007 | 84.4% | -1.8% |
| 2008 | 84.8% | +0.4% |
| 2009 | 89.2% | +5.2% |
| 2010 | 89.6% | +0.5% |
| 2011 | 89.7% | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 92.1% | +2.8% |
| 2015 | 98.8% | +7.3% |
| 2016 | 95.3% | -3.6% |
| 2017 | 87.8% | -7.9% |
| 2019 | 111.1% | +26.5% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 111.1% is above the median for high income countries, which is 41.8%, 2.7× the median. (6 countries reporting)
- Poland's 111.1% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 63.0%, 1.8× the median. (11 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.0% | 84.4% | 89.2% | 5 |
| 2010s | 94.9% | 87.8% | 111.1% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban in Poland?
- Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban in Poland was 111.1% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 111.1% in 2019.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 84.4% in 2007.
- How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Poland ranks 1st out of 34 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 24.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group