Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance in Belarus

Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance was 11.3% in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
11.3%
Change on year
down 6.4%
World rank
14th
of 34 countries
All-time high
38.6%
in 2016
All-time low
6.2%
in 2008
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance in Belarus, 2008–2019

102030402008201320192008: 6.22009: 72010: 72012: 82013: 112014: 12.52015: 122016: 38.62017: 12.72018: 122019: 11.3

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social assistance in Belarus stood at 11.3%.

The figure is down 6.4% on the previous year and up 61.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social assistance in Belarus peaked at 38.6% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 6.2%, in 2008.

Belarus ranks 14th of 34 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -urban in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 6.2%
2009 7.0% +11.7%
2010 7.0% +0.3%
2012 8.0% +15.2%
2013 11.0% +36.2%
2014 12.5% +14.3%
2015 12.0% -4.2%
2016 38.6% +222.2%
2017 12.7% -67.1%
2018 12.0% -5.5%
2019 11.3% -6.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 6.6% 6.2% 7.0% 2
2010s 13.9% 7.0% 38.6% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 11 Kyrgyzstan 13.2% compare
  2. 12 Romania 12.5% compare
  3. 13 Republic of Moldova 11.3% compare
  4. 15 Mexico 11.0% compare
  5. 16 Costa Rica 10.9% compare
  6. 17 Mongolia 9.5% compare

See the full ranking of 34 places →

More work & labour data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social assistance in Belarus?
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social assistance in Belarus was 11.3% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social assistance recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 38.6% in 2016.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social assistance recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 6.2% in 2008.
How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social assistance?
Belarus ranks 14th out of 34 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social assistance rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 61.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-all-social-assistance-urban/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-all-social-assistance-urban/belarus/">Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
34 places, 340 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group