Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus

Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash was 27.8% in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
27.8%
Change on year
down 4.6%
World rank
3rd
of 25 countries
All-time high
106.0%
in 2016
All-time low
11.2%
in 2008
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus, 2008–2019

204060801002008201320192008: 11.22009: 11.42010: 14.52012: 14.82013: 232014: 23.52015: 26.22016: 1062017: 26.42018: 29.22019: 27.8

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus is 27.8%, measured in 2019.

The figure is down 4.6% on the previous year and up 144.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus peaked at 106.0% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 11.2%, in 2008.

Belarus ranks 3rd of 25 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 11.2%
2009 11.4% +1.7%
2010 14.5% +27.5%
2012 14.8% +1.7%
2013 23.0% +55.8%
2014 23.5% +2.0%
2015 26.2% +11.7%
2016 106.0% +304.6%
2017 26.4% -75.1%
2018 29.2% +10.5%
2019 27.8% -4.6%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 11.3% 11.2% 11.4% 2
2010s 32.4% 14.5% 106.0% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 1 Kosovo 27.9% compare
  2. 1 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 27.9% compare
  3. 4 Georgia 27.3% compare
  4. 5 Poland 26.3% compare
  5. 6 Armenia 26.0% compare

See the full ranking of 25 places →

More work & labour data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus?
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus was 27.8% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 106.0% in 2016.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 11.2% in 2008.
How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
Belarus ranks 3rd out of 25 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 144.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-urban/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-urban/belarus/">Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
25 places, 211 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group