Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Honduras

Honduras: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private was 36.8% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
36.8%
Change on year
down 8.9%
World rank
14th
of 27 countries
All-time high
45.3%
in 2008
All-time low
10.6%
in 2009
Years of data
10
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Honduras, 2008–2019

10203040502008201320192008: 45.32009: 10.62010: 37.92011: 39.72013: 37.62015: 29.62016: 37.12017: 33.42018: 40.42019: 36.8

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Honduras stood at 36.8%.

That represents a change of down 8.9% on the previous year and up 248.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Honduras peaked at 45.3% in 2008 and was at its lowest, 10.6%, in 2009.

Honduras ranks 14th of 27 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 10 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Honduras, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers in Honduras, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 45.3%
2009 10.6% -76.6%
2010 37.9% +258.1%
2011 39.7% +4.8%
2013 37.6% -5.4%
2015 29.6% -21.2%
2016 37.1% +25.5%
2017 33.4% -10.0%
2018 40.4% +20.9%
2019 36.8% -8.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 28.0% 10.6% 45.3% 2
2010s 36.6% 29.6% 40.4% 8

Countries ranked near Honduras

  1. 11 South Africa 49.3%
  2. 12 Sri Lanka 44.0% compare
  3. 13 Ecuador 43.0% compare
  4. 15 Serbia 33.7% compare
  5. 16 Mexico 29.6% compare
  6. 17 Türkiye 27.6% compare

See the full ranking of 27 places →

More work & labour data for Honduras

All data for Honduras →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Honduras?
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Honduras was 36.8% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Honduras?
The highest recorded value was 45.3% in 2008.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Honduras?
The lowest recorded value was 10.6% in 2009.
How does Honduras rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
Honduras ranks 14th out of 27 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private rising or falling in Honduras?
Over the last ten years it is up 248.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Honduras data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Honduras. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers/honduras/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers/honduras/">Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Honduras</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 266 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group