Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers was 34.4% in 2020. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Kyrgyzstan, 2006–2020
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Kyrgyzstan recorded 34.4% for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in 2020.
That represents a change of down 13.0% on the previous year and up 20.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 58.4% in 2015 and was at its lowest, 28.6%, in 2011.
That places Kyrgyzstan 6th out of 31 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 41.9% | — |
| 2011 | 28.6% | -31.9% |
| 2012 | 39.2% | +37.0% |
| 2013 | 31.6% | -19.4% |
| 2014 | 45.4% | +43.7% |
| 2015 | 58.4% | +28.9% |
| 2016 | 54.8% | -6.2% |
| 2017 | 53.0% | -3.3% |
| 2018 | 47.1% | -11.2% |
| 2019 | 39.5% | -16.1% |
| 2020 | 34.4% | -13.0% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 34.4% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 22.6%, 1.5× the median. (9 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.9% | 41.9% | 41.9% | 1 |
| 2010s | 44.2% | 28.6% | 58.4% | 9 |
| 2020s | 34.4% | 34.4% | 34.4% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
- 3 Thailand 42.2% compare
- 4 Romania 37.0% compare
- 5 Republic of Moldova 34.6% compare
- 7 Sri Lanka 31.1% compare
- 8 Dominican Republic 26.7% compare
- 9 Costa Rica 26.1% compare
More work & labour data for Kyrgyzstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.0196 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.0278 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.0124 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -0.8283 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.79 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 4,346 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 3,767 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 5,899 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 5,831 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 11,730 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Kyrgyzstan?
- Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Kyrgyzstan was 34.4% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 58.4% in 2015.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 28.6% in 2011.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th out of 31 countries with data for 2020.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 20.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group