Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Poland
Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers was 6,839.3% in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Poland recorded 6,839.3% for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in 2019. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
That represents a change of up 68,349.4% on the previous year and up 58,089.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Poland peaked at 6,839.3% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 10.0%, in 2017.
That places Poland 1st out of 30 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Poland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 13.6% | — |
| 2006 | 12.1% | -11.2% |
| 2007 | 13.7% | +13.9% |
| 2008 | 11.0% | -20.3% |
| 2009 | 11.8% | +7.3% |
| 2010 | 10.3% | -12.2% |
| 2011 | 10.5% | +1.5% |
| 2012 | 12.8% | +22.0% |
| 2015 | 11.1% | -13.0% |
| 2016 | 10.1% | -8.8% |
| 2017 | 10.0% | -1.5% |
| 2019 | 6,839.3% | +68349.3% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 6,839.3% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 17.1%, 401.0× the median. (9 countries reporting)
- Poland's 6,839.3% is above the median for high income countries, which is 25.3%, 270.4× the median. (6 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.4% | 11.0% | 13.7% | 5 |
| 2010s | 986.3% | 10.0% | 6,839.3% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Poland?
- Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Poland was 6,839.3% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 6,839.3% in 2019.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 10.0% in 2017.
- How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
- Poland ranks 1st out of 30 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 58,089.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group