Adequacy of benefits: Domestic Private … 2nd Domestic rural in Moldova

Moldova: Adequacy of benefits: Domestic Private … 2nd Domestic rural was 34.2% in 2018. ▼ Falling

Latest (2018)
34.2%
Change on year
up 34.9%
World rank
5th
of 30 countries
All-time high
46.0%
in 2010
All-time low
25.3%
in 2017
Years of data
5
2010–2018

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Moldova, 2010–2018

010203040502010201420182010: 462012: 45.32013: 352017: 25.32018: 34.2

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2018, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Moldova stood at 34.2%.

The figure is up 34.9% on the previous year and down 25.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Moldova peaked at 46.0% in 2010 and was at its lowest, 25.3%, in 2017.

Moldova ranks 5th of 30 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Adequacy of benefits: Domestic Private … 2nd Domestic rural in Moldova, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural in Moldova, 2010 to 2018.
Year Value Change
2010 46.0% —
2012 45.3% -1.4%
2013 35.0% -22.8%
2017 25.3% -27.6%
2018 34.2% +34.9%

Moldova compared with similar countries

  • Moldova's 34.2% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 17.1%, 2.0× the median. (9 countries reporting)
  • Moldova's 34.2% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 18.4%, 1.9× the median. (18 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Moldova

  1. 2 Vietnam 54.3% compare
  2. 3 Thailand 41.8% compare
  3. 4 Romania 35.9% compare
  4. 6 Sri Lanka 30.7% compare
  5. 7 Kyrgyzstan 30.4% compare
  6. 8 Costa Rica 29.4% compare

See the full ranking of 30 places →

More work & labour data for Moldova

All data for Moldova →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Moldova?
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Moldova was 34.2% in 2018, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Moldova?
The highest recorded value was 46.0% in 2010.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Moldova?
The lowest recorded value was 25.3% in 2017.
How does Moldova rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
Moldova ranks 5th out of 30 countries with data for 2018.
Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers rising or falling in Moldova?
Over the last ten years it is down 25.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Moldova data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Moldova. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-domestic-private-transfers-rural/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-domestic-private-transfers-rural/moldova/">Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Moldova</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
30 places, 295 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group