Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Belarus
Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers was 10.5% in 2019. ▬ Flat
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Belarus recorded 10.5% for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in 2019.
That represents a change of down 0.3% on the previous year and down 7.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Belarus peaked at 14.6% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 9.2%, in 2008.
Belarus ranks 28th of 30 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 9.2% | — |
| 2009 | 11.4% | +23.6% |
| 2010 | 9.9% | -13.3% |
| 2012 | 14.6% | +47.7% |
| 2013 | 13.6% | -6.6% |
| 2014 | 12.7% | -6.4% |
| 2015 | 10.4% | -18.3% |
| 2016 | 13.9% | +33.4% |
| 2017 | 10.1% | -26.9% |
| 2018 | 10.5% | +4.0% |
| 2019 | 10.5% | -0.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.3% | 9.2% | 11.4% | 2 |
| 2010s | 11.8% | 9.9% | 14.6% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 25 Kazakhstan 15.0% compare
- 26 Armenia 12.3% compare
- 27 Ecuador 10.9% compare
- 29 Malawi 6.9% compare
- 30 Burkina Faso 5.4% compare
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Belarus?
- Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Belarus was 10.5% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 14.6% in 2012.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 9.2% in 2008.
- How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
- Belarus ranks 28th out of 30 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 7.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group