Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Uruguay
Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers was 17.1% in 2022. ▼ Falling
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Uruguay, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
In 2022, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Uruguay stood at 17.1%.
That represents a change of down 3.8% on the previous year and up 11.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Uruguay peaked at 19.5% in 2009 and was at its lowest, 14.4%, in 2017.
Uruguay ranks 21st of 31 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Uruguay, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 18.5% | — |
| 2009 | 19.5% | +5.4% |
| 2010 | 18.6% | -4.9% |
| 2011 | 18.0% | -3.2% |
| 2012 | 15.3% | -14.8% |
| 2015 | 16.0% | +4.8% |
| 2016 | 15.9% | -0.9% |
| 2017 | 14.4% | -9.3% |
| 2018 | 15.6% | +8.4% |
| 2019 | 16.8% | +7.8% |
| 2020 | 17.2% | +2.1% |
| 2021 | 17.7% | +3.3% |
| 2022 | 17.1% | -3.8% |
Uruguay compared with similar countries
- Uruguay's 17.1% is below the median for high income countries, which is 21.3%, 80% of the median. (6 countries reporting)
- Uruguay's 17.1% is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 19.2%, 89% of the median. (15 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.0% | 18.5% | 19.5% | 2 |
| 2010s | 16.3% | 14.4% | 18.6% | 8 |
| 2020s | 17.3% | 17.1% | 17.7% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Uruguay
More work & labour data for Uruguay
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.02 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.72 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.0269 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 3,567 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 95.27 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,144 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,102 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 2,246 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Uruguay?
- Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Uruguay was 17.1% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Uruguay?
- The highest recorded value was 19.5% in 2009.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Uruguay?
- The lowest recorded value was 14.4% in 2017.
- How does Uruguay rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
- Uruguay ranks 21st out of 31 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers rising or falling in Uruguay?
- Over the last ten years it is up 11.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Uruguay data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group