Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Belarus
Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and was 63.7% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Belarus is 63.7%, measured in 2019.
The figure is up 1.7% on the previous year and up 49.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Belarus peaked at 90.4% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 34.4%, in 2008.
Belarus ranks 4th of 36 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 34.4% | — |
| 2009 | 42.5% | +23.6% |
| 2010 | 42.3% | -0.5% |
| 2012 | 49.2% | +16.3% |
| 2013 | 58.4% | +18.6% |
| 2014 | 58.4% | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 60.9% | +4.4% |
| 2016 | 90.4% | +48.3% |
| 2017 | 63.7% | -29.5% |
| 2018 | 62.6% | -1.7% |
| 2019 | 63.7% | +1.7% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 63.7% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 34.1%, 1.9× the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 63.7% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 54.3%, 1.2× the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.5% | 34.4% | 42.5% | 2 |
| 2010s | 61.1% | 42.3% | 90.4% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Belarus?
- Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Belarus was 63.7% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 90.4% in 2016.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 34.4% in 2008.
- How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Belarus ranks 4th out of 36 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 49.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group