Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) … 2nd Protection Labor rural in Moldova

Moldova: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) … 2nd Protection Labor rural was 55.1% in 2018. ▲ Rising

Latest (2018)
55.1%
Change on year
up 14.9%
World rank
7th
of 36 countries
All-time high
55.1%
in 2018
All-time low
42.7%
in 2012
Years of data
5
2010–2018

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Moldova, 2010–2018

02040602010201420182010: 48.52012: 42.72013: 49.92017: 482018: 55.1

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2018, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Moldova stood at 55.1%. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 14.9% on the previous year and up 13.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Moldova peaked at 55.1% in 2018 and was at its lowest, 42.7%, in 2012.

That places Moldova 7th out of 36 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the top quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) … 2nd Protection Labor rural in Moldova, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural in Moldova, 2010 to 2018.
Year Value Change
2010 48.5% —
2012 42.7% -12.0%
2013 49.9% +16.9%
2017 48.0% -3.8%
2018 55.1% +14.9%

Moldova compared with similar countries

  • Moldova's 55.1% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 28.3%, 2.0× the median. (23 countries reporting)
  • Moldova's 55.1% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 55.6%, 99% of the median. (12 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Moldova

  1. 4 Georgia 62.6% compare
  2. 5 Romania 59.3% compare
  3. 6 Ukraine 56.1% compare
  4. 8 Brazil 47.9% compare
  5. 9 Armenia 47.6% compare
  6. 10 Kyrgyzstan 44.8% compare

See the full ranking of 36 places →

More work & labour data for Moldova

All data for Moldova →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Moldova?
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Moldova was 55.1% in 2018, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Moldova?
The highest recorded value was 55.1% in 2018.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Moldova?
The lowest recorded value was 42.7% in 2012.
How does Moldova rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
Moldova ranks 7th out of 36 countries with data for 2018.
Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and rising or falling in Moldova?
Over the last ten years it is up 13.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Moldova data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Moldova. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-all-social-protection-and-labor-rural/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-all-social-protection-and-labor-rural/moldova/">Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Moldova</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 352 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group