Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Georgia
Georgia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and was 49.9% in 2021. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Georgia, 2011–2021
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
Georgia recorded 49.9% for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and in 2021. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.
That represents a change of up 0.6% on the previous year and up 36.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Georgia peaked at 49.9% in 2021 and was at its lowest, 36.5%, in 2011.
Georgia ranks 10th of 37 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Georgia, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 36.5% | — |
| 2012 | 38.5% | +5.3% |
| 2013 | 40.8% | +6.0% |
| 2014 | 44.0% | +7.9% |
| 2015 | 41.1% | -6.6% |
| 2016 | 46.7% | +13.6% |
| 2017 | 41.8% | -10.5% |
| 2018 | 40.7% | -2.6% |
| 2019 | 44.0% | +8.1% |
| 2020 | 49.6% | +12.8% |
| 2021 | 49.9% | +0.6% |
Georgia compared with similar countries
- Georgia's 49.9% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 34.4%, 1.4× the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Georgia's 49.9% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 52.6%, 95% of the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 41.6% | 36.5% | 46.7% | 9 |
| 2020s | 49.8% | 49.6% | 49.9% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Georgia
More work & labour data for Georgia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.5749 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.5695 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.5795 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.16 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.0234 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 2,483 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 911.09 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,505 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,465 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 2,969 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Georgia?
- Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Georgia was 49.9% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Georgia?
- The highest recorded value was 49.9% in 2021.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Georgia?
- The lowest recorded value was 36.5% in 2011.
- How does Georgia rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Georgia ranks 10th out of 37 countries with data for 2021.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and rising or falling in Georgia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 36.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Georgia data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group