Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban in Costa Rica
Costa Rica: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban was 36.2% in 2022. ▬ Flat
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban in Costa Rica, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Costa Rica recorded 36.2% for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban in 2022.
That represents a change of down 7.0% on the previous year and up 3.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban in Costa Rica peaked at 45.1% in 2008 and was at its lowest, 30.1%, in 2015.
That places Costa Rica 25th out of 34 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban in Costa Rica, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 45.1% | — |
| 2010 | 35.7% | -21.0% |
| 2011 | 35.3% | -0.9% |
| 2012 | 35.0% | -1.0% |
| 2014 | 32.5% | -7.1% |
| 2015 | 30.1% | -7.4% |
| 2016 | 33.9% | +12.5% |
| 2017 | 35.5% | +4.8% |
| 2018 | 37.9% | +7.0% |
| 2019 | 37.2% | -2.0% |
| 2020 | 39.5% | +6.2% |
| 2021 | 38.9% | -1.5% |
| 2022 | 36.2% | -7.0% |
Costa Rica compared with similar countries
- Costa Rica's 36.2% is below the median for high income countries, which is 42.1%, 86% of the median. (6 countries reporting)
- Costa Rica's 36.2% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 36.2%, 1.0× the median. (15 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.1% | 45.1% | 45.1% | 1 |
| 2010s | 34.8% | 30.1% | 37.9% | 9 |
| 2020s | 38.2% | 36.2% | 39.5% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Costa Rica
More work & labour data for Costa Rica
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.9965 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.9952 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.9977 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.61 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.29 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 5,205 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 569.35 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,908 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,868 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 3,776 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban in Costa Rica?
- Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban in Costa Rica was 36.2% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban recorded in Costa Rica?
- The highest recorded value was 45.1% in 2008.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban recorded in Costa Rica?
- The lowest recorded value was 30.1% in 2015.
- How does Costa Rica rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Costa Rica ranks 25th out of 34 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban rising or falling in Costa Rica?
- Over the last ten years it is up 3.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group