Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance in Ecuador
Ecuador: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance was 43.0% in 2022. ▼ Falling
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance in Ecuador, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance in Ecuador is 43.0%, measured in 2022.
That represents a change of up 12.7% on the previous year and down 20.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance in Ecuador peaked at 54.1% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 30.7%, in 2015.
Ecuador ranks 23rd of 34 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 48.2% | — |
| 2010 | 50.4% | +4.7% |
| 2011 | 52.5% | +4.2% |
| 2012 | 54.1% | +2.9% |
| 2014 | 31.9% | -40.9% |
| 2015 | 30.7% | -3.9% |
| 2016 | 52.6% | +71.7% |
| 2017 | 34.8% | -33.9% |
| 2018 | 38.9% | +11.6% |
| 2019 | 33.4% | -14.0% |
| 2020 | 34.3% | +2.7% |
| 2021 | 38.1% | +11.0% |
| 2022 | 43.0% | +12.7% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 43.0% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 51.2%, 84% of the median. (22 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 43.0% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 40.9%, 1.0× the median. (15 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.2% | 48.2% | 48.2% | 1 |
| 2010s | 42.2% | 30.7% | 54.1% | 9 |
| 2020s | 38.5% | 34.3% | 43.0% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More work & labour data for Ecuador
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.578 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.567 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.589 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.04 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.13 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 17,174 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 5,794 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,543 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,549 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,092 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance in Ecuador?
- Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance in Ecuador was 43.0% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 54.1% in 2012.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 30.7% in 2015.
- How does Ecuador rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance?
- Ecuador ranks 23rd out of 34 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 20.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group