Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance was 22.7% in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance in Kazakhstan, 2007–2021
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2021, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance in Kazakhstan stood at 22.7%.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 9.4% on the previous year and up 199.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance in Kazakhstan peaked at 39.2% in 2014 and was at its lowest, 4.1%, in 2007.
Kazakhstan ranks 11th of 34 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 4.1% | — |
| 2010 | 7.6% | +86.0% |
| 2014 | 39.2% | +418.6% |
| 2015 | 13.1% | -66.6% |
| 2017 | 17.5% | +33.8% |
| 2018 | 18.0% | +2.7% |
| 2019 | 21.7% | +20.8% |
| 2020 | 25.0% | +15.2% |
| 2021 | 22.7% | -9.4% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 22.7% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 23.1%, 98% of the median. (12 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's 22.7% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 15.1%, 1.5× the median. (22 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.1% | 4.1% | 4.1% | 1 |
| 2010s | 19.5% | 7.6% | 39.2% | 6 |
| 2020s | 23.8% | 22.7% | 25.0% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
- 8 Mexico 23.8% compare
- 9 Kosovo 23.6% compare
- 9 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 23.6% compare
- 12 Costa Rica 22.3% compare
- 13 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 21.2% compare
- 14 Chile 21.2% compare
More work & labour data for Kazakhstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.2152 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.2212 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.2086 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.02 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.25 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 15,866 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 7,093 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 16,815 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 16,857 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 33,672 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance in Kazakhstan?
- Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance in Kazakhstan was 22.7% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 39.2% in 2014.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 4.1% in 2007.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance?
- Kazakhstan ranks 11th out of 34 countries with data for 2021.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 199.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group