Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Kosovo

Kosovo: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional was 42.0% in 2017. ▼ Falling

Latest (2017)
42.0%
World rank
5th
of 26 countries
All-time high
47.8%
in 2006
All-time low
31.1%
in 2012
Years of data
5
2006–2017

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Kosovo, 2006–2017

010203040502006201120172006: 47.82011: 35.72012: 31.12013: 33.82017: 42

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2017, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Kosovo stood at 42.0%.

That represents a change of down 12.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Kosovo peaked at 47.8% in 2006 and was at its lowest, 31.1%, in 2012.

Kosovo ranks 5th of 26 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Kosovo, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers in Kosovo, 2006 to 2017.
Year Value Change
2006 47.8%
2011 35.7% -25.4%
2012 31.1% -12.7%
2013 33.8% +8.7%
2017 42.0% +24.1%

Kosovo compared with similar countries

  • Kosovo's 42.0% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 34.7%, 1.2× the median. (12 countries reporting)
  • Kosovo's 42.0% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 17.8%, 2.4× the median. (18 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 47.8% 47.8% 47.8% 1
2010s 35.6% 31.1% 42.0% 4

Countries ranked near Kosovo

  1. 2 Poland 46.8% compare
  2. 3 Serbia 45.9% compare
  3. 4 Armenia 45.2% compare
  4. 5 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 42.0% compare
  5. 7 Belarus 40.5% compare
  6. 8 Romania 28.9% compare

See the full ranking of 26 places →

More work & labour data for Kosovo

All data for Kosovo →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Kosovo?
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Kosovo was 42.0% in 2017, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Kosovo?
The highest recorded value was 47.8% in 2006.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Kosovo?
The lowest recorded value was 31.1% in 2012.
How does Kosovo rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
Kosovo ranks 5th out of 26 countries with data for 2017.
Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional rising or falling in Kosovo?
Over the last ten years it is down 12.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Kosovo data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Kosovo. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers/kosovo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers/kosovo/">Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Kosovo</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
26 places, 222 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group