Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Indonesia

Indonesia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional was 6.9% in 2022. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2022)
6.9%
Change on year
down 0.7%
World rank
18th
of 25 countries
All-time high
26.2%
in 2015
All-time low
4.2%
in 2018
Years of data
7
2015–2022

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Indonesia, 2015–2022

5101520252015201820222015: 26.22016: 4.42018: 4.22019: 8.72020: 8.22021: 72022: 6.9

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Indonesia is 6.9%, measured in 2022.

The figure is down 0.7% on the previous year and down 73.6% over ten years.

Indonesia ranks 18th of 25 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Indonesia, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban in Indonesia, 2015 to 2022.
Year Value Change
2015 26.2%
2016 4.4% -83.0%
2018 4.2% -5.6%
2019 8.7% +107.7%
2020 8.2% -6.1%
2021 7.0% -14.8%
2022 6.9% -0.7%

Indonesia compared with similar countries

  • Indonesia's 6.9% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 17.6%, 39% of the median. (17 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 10.9% 4.2% 26.2% 4
2020s 7.4% 6.9% 8.2% 3

Countries ranked near Indonesia

  1. 15 Ukraine 15.3%
  2. 16 Viet Nam 11.9% compare
  3. 17 Sri Lanka 8.8% compare
  4. 19 Chile 6.9% compare
  5. 20 Türkiye 6.0% compare
  6. 21 Pakistan 4.7%

See the full ranking of 25 places →

More work & labour data for Indonesia

All data for Indonesia →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Indonesia?
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Indonesia was 6.9% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Indonesia?
The highest recorded value was 26.2% in 2015.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Indonesia?
The lowest recorded value was 4.2% in 2018.
How does Indonesia rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
Indonesia ranks 18th out of 25 countries with data for 2022.
Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional rising or falling in Indonesia?
Over the last ten years it is down 73.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Indonesia data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Indonesia. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-urban/indonesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-urban/indonesia/">Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Indonesia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
25 places, 211 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group