Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional was 25.3% in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Kazakhstan, 2007–2021
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Kazakhstan is 25.3%, measured in 2021.
That represents a change of down 6.3% on the previous year and up 439.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Kazakhstan peaked at 76.6% in 2014 and was at its lowest, 3.9%, in 2007.
Kazakhstan ranks 11th of 26 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 3.9% | — |
| 2010 | 4.7% | +20.0% |
| 2014 | 76.6% | +1532.4% |
| 2015 | 11.4% | -85.2% |
| 2017 | 16.4% | +44.5% |
| 2018 | 18.6% | +13.2% |
| 2019 | 25.5% | +37.2% |
| 2020 | 27.0% | +5.8% |
| 2021 | 25.3% | -6.3% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 25.3% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 39.8%, 63% of the median. (12 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's 25.3% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 23.2%, 1.1× the median. (18 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.9% | 3.9% | 3.9% | 1 |
| 2010s | 25.5% | 4.7% | 76.6% | 6 |
| 2020s | 26.1% | 25.3% | 27.0% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
- 8 Kosovo 38.5% compare
- 8 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 38.5% compare
- 10 Republic of Moldova 26.6% compare
- 12 Argentina 24.8% compare
- 13 Kyrgyzstan 24.2% compare
- 14 Costa Rica 21.7% compare
More work & labour data for Kazakhstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.2152 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.2212 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.2086 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.02 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.25 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 15,866 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 7,093 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 16,815 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 16,857 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 33,672 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Kazakhstan?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Kazakhstan was 25.3% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 76.6% in 2014.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.9% in 2007.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Kazakhstan ranks 11th out of 26 countries with data for 2021.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 439.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group