Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International in Burkina Faso

Burkina Faso: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International was 7.5% in 2021. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2021)
7.5%
Change on year
up 64.8%
World rank
26th
of 27 countries
All-time high
187.8%
in 2003
All-time low
4.6%
in 2018
Years of data
5
2003–2021

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International in Burkina Faso, 2003–2021

0501001502002003201220212003: 187.82009: 10.52014: 19.72018: 4.62021: 7.5

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2021, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in Burkina Faso stood at 7.5%.

That represents a change of up 64.8% on the previous year and down 28.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in Burkina Faso peaked at 187.8% in 2003 and was at its lowest, 4.6%, in 2018.

That places Burkina Faso 26th out of 27 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International in Burkina Faso, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban in Burkina Faso, 2003 to 2021.
Year Value Change
2003 187.8%
2009 10.5% -94.4%
2014 19.7% +86.8%
2018 4.6% -76.7%
2021 7.5% +64.8%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 99.2% 10.5% 187.8% 2
2010s 12.1% 4.6% 19.7% 2
2020s 7.5% 7.5% 7.5% 1

Countries ranked near Burkina Faso

  1. 23 Turkey 23.6% compare
  2. 24 Colombia 22.7% compare
  3. 25 Bolivia 14.6% compare
  4. 27 Uruguay 3.7% compare

See the full ranking of 27 places →

More work & labour data for Burkina Faso

All data for Burkina Faso →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in Burkina Faso?
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in Burkina Faso was 7.5% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international recorded in Burkina Faso?
The highest recorded value was 187.8% in 2003.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international recorded in Burkina Faso?
The lowest recorded value was 4.6% in 2018.
How does Burkina Faso rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
Burkina Faso ranks 26th out of 27 countries with data for 2021.
Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international rising or falling in Burkina Faso?
Over the last ten years it is down 28.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Burkina Faso data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International in Burkina Faso. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-international-private-transfers-urban/burkina-faso/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-international-private-transfers-urban/burkina-faso/">Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International in Burkina Faso</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 259 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group