Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Brazil

Brazil: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private was 24.3% in 2022. ▬ Flat

Latest (2022)
24.3%
Change on year
down 16.9%
World rank
16th
of 31 countries
All-time high
29.4%
in 2017
All-time low
21.9%
in 2020
Years of data
8
2015–2022

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Brazil, 2015–2022

01020302015201820222015: 22.82016: 28.82017: 29.42018: 27.52019: 27.32020: 21.92021: 29.32022: 24.3

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Brazil recorded 24.3% for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in 2022.

The figure is down 16.9% on the previous year and up 6.4% over ten years.

That places Brazil 16th out of 31 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Brazil, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban in Brazil, 2015 to 2022.
Year Value Change
2015 22.8%
2016 28.8% +25.9%
2017 29.4% +2.2%
2018 27.5% -6.3%
2019 27.3% -0.8%
2020 21.9% -20.0%
2021 29.3% +33.9%
2022 24.3% -16.9%

Brazil compared with similar countries

  • Brazil's 24.3% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 24.3%, 1.0× the median. (19 countries reporting)
  • Brazil's 24.3% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 24.0%, 1.0× the median. (15 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 27.2% 22.8% 29.4% 5
2020s 25.1% 21.9% 29.3% 3

Countries ranked near Brazil

  1. 13 Honduras 27.9% compare
  2. 14 Armenia 26.6% compare
  3. 15 Mongolia 25.2% compare
  4. 17 Paraguay 24.0% compare
  5. 18 Peru 23.5% compare
  6. 19 Chile 23.5% compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More work & labour data for Brazil

All data for Brazil →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Brazil?
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Brazil was 24.3% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Brazil?
The highest recorded value was 29.4% in 2017.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Brazil?
The lowest recorded value was 21.9% in 2020.
How does Brazil rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
Brazil ranks 16th out of 31 countries with data for 2022.
Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private rising or falling in Brazil?
Over the last ten years it is up 6.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Brazil data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Brazil. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-domestic-private-transfers-urban/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-domestic-private-transfers-urban/brazil/">Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Brazil</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 316 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group