Adequacy of benefits: Domestic Private … 1st Domestic rural in Moldova

Moldova: Adequacy of benefits: Domestic Private … 1st Domestic rural was 35.1% in 2018. ▼ Falling

Latest (2018)
35.1%
Change on year
down 0.6%
World rank
8th
of 30 countries
All-time high
55.5%
in 2012
All-time low
31.8%
in 2013
Years of data
5
2010–2018

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Moldova, 2010–2018

02040602010201420182010: 32.12012: 55.52013: 31.82017: 35.32018: 35.1

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2018, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Moldova stood at 35.1%.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.6% on the previous year and up 9.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Moldova peaked at 55.5% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 31.8%, in 2013.

That places Moldova 8th out of 30 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the top quarter.

Adequacy of benefits: Domestic Private … 1st Domestic rural in Moldova, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural in Moldova, 2010 to 2018.
Year Value Change
2010 32.1% —
2012 55.5% +72.9%
2013 31.8% -42.7%
2017 35.3% +10.7%
2018 35.1% -0.6%

Moldova compared with similar countries

  • Moldova's 35.1% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 22.0%, 1.6× the median. (9 countries reporting)
  • Moldova's 35.1% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 23.1%, 1.5× the median. (18 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Moldova

  1. 5 Kyrgyzstan 38.5% compare
  2. 6 Dominican Republic 37.2% compare
  3. 7 Paraguay 36.9% compare
  4. 9 Vietnam 32.8% compare
  5. 10 Sri Lanka 32.8% compare
  6. 11 Colombia 31.5% compare

See the full ranking of 30 places →

More work & labour data for Moldova

All data for Moldova →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Moldova?
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Moldova was 35.1% in 2018, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Moldova?
The highest recorded value was 55.5% in 2012.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Moldova?
The lowest recorded value was 31.8% in 2013.
How does Moldova rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
Moldova ranks 8th out of 30 countries with data for 2018.
Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private rising or falling in Moldova?
Over the last ten years it is up 9.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Moldova data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Moldova. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-domestic-private-transfers-rural/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-domestic-private-transfers-rural/moldova/">Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Moldova</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
30 places, 295 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group