Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Brazil

Brazil: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private was 27.6% in 2022. ▲ Rising

Latest (2022)
27.6%
Change on year
down 6.5%
World rank
12th
of 30 countries
All-time high
37.7%
in 2017
All-time low
14.4%
in 2015
Years of data
8
2015–2022

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Brazil, 2015–2022

0102030402015201820222015: 14.42016: 33.82017: 37.72018: 33.32019: 35.52020: 23.82021: 29.52022: 27.6

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2022, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Brazil stood at 27.6%.

The figure is down 6.5% on the previous year and up 91.9% over ten years.

That places Brazil 12th out of 30 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Brazil, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural in Brazil, 2015 to 2022.
Year Value Change
2015 14.4%
2016 33.8% +134.8%
2017 37.7% +11.5%
2018 33.3% -11.7%
2019 35.5% +6.6%
2020 23.8% -33.0%
2021 29.5% +24.2%
2022 27.6% -6.5%

Brazil compared with similar countries

  • Brazil's 27.6% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 23.1%, 1.2× the median. (18 countries reporting)
  • Brazil's 27.6% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 22.8%, 1.2× the median. (14 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 30.9% 14.4% 37.7% 5
2020s 27.0% 23.8% 29.5% 3

Countries ranked near Brazil

  1. 9 Viet Nam 32.8% compare
  2. 10 Sri Lanka 32.8% compare
  3. 11 Colombia 31.5% compare
  4. 13 El Salvador 24.2% compare
  5. 14 Honduras 22.8% compare
  6. 15 Chile 22.7% compare

See the full ranking of 30 places →

More work & labour data for Brazil

All data for Brazil →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Brazil?
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Brazil was 27.6% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Brazil?
The highest recorded value was 37.7% in 2017.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Brazil?
The lowest recorded value was 14.4% in 2015.
How does Brazil rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
Brazil ranks 12th out of 30 countries with data for 2022.
Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private rising or falling in Brazil?
Over the last ten years it is up 91.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Brazil data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Brazil. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-domestic-private-transfers-rural/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-domestic-private-transfers-rural/brazil/">Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Brazil</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
30 places, 295 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group