Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Belarus
Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private was 10.3% in 2019. ▬ Flat
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Belarus is 10.3%, measured in 2019.
The figure is down 14.8% on the previous year and down 11.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Belarus peaked at 16.6% in 2013 and was at its lowest, 9.5%, in 2008.
Belarus ranks 29th of 31 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Belarus, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 9.5% | — |
| 2009 | 11.6% | +22.2% |
| 2010 | 11.2% | -3.4% |
| 2012 | 13.7% | +22.1% |
| 2013 | 16.6% | +20.8% |
| 2014 | 14.4% | -13.4% |
| 2015 | 12.5% | -13.2% |
| 2016 | 15.2% | +21.5% |
| 2017 | 9.9% | -34.8% |
| 2018 | 12.1% | +22.6% |
| 2019 | 10.3% | -14.8% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 10.3% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 24.8%, 42% of the median. (9 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 10.3% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 24.2%, 43% of the median. (19 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.6% | 9.5% | 11.6% | 2 |
| 2010s | 12.9% | 9.9% | 16.6% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Belarus?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Belarus was 10.3% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 16.6% in 2013.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 9.5% in 2008.
- How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
- Belarus ranks 29th out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 11.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group