Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social in Moldova

Moldova: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social was 61.1% in 2018. ▲ Rising

Latest (2018)
61.1%
Change on year
up 18.7%
World rank
10th
of 36 countries
All-time high
61.1%
in 2018
All-time low
51.4%
in 2013
Years of data
5
2010–2018

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social in Moldova, 2010–2018

02040602010201420182010: 51.72012: 55.22013: 51.42017: 51.52018: 61.1

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2018, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in Moldova stood at 61.1%. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 18.7% on the previous year and up 18.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in Moldova peaked at 61.1% in 2018 and was at its lowest, 51.4%, in 2013.

That places Moldova 10th out of 36 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the middle of the range.

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social in Moldova, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban in Moldova, 2010 to 2018.
Year Value Change
2010 51.7%
2012 55.2% +6.8%
2013 51.4% -6.7%
2017 51.5% +0.1%
2018 61.1% +18.7%

Moldova compared with similar countries

  • Moldova's 61.1% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 37.8%, 1.6× the median. (24 countries reporting)
  • Moldova's 61.1% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 63.6%, 96% of the median. (12 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Moldova

  1. 7 Romania 65.3% compare
  2. 8 Armenia 64.0% compare
  3. 9 Ukraine 63.2% compare
  4. 11 Kyrgyzstan 53.1% compare
  5. 12 Cote d'Ivoire 51.9% compare
  6. 13 Kazakhstan 51.6% compare

See the full ranking of 36 places →

More work & labour data for Moldova

All data for Moldova →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in Moldova?
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in Moldova was 61.1% in 2018, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social recorded in Moldova?
The highest recorded value was 61.1% in 2018.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social recorded in Moldova?
The lowest recorded value was 51.4% in 2013.
How does Moldova rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
Moldova ranks 10th out of 36 countries with data for 2018.
Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social rising or falling in Moldova?
Over the last ten years it is up 18.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Moldova data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social in Moldova. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-social-protection-and-labor-urban/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-social-protection-and-labor-urban/moldova/">Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social in Moldova</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 367 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group