Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social in Poland
Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social was 98.0% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Poland recorded 98.0% for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in 2019. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 40.9% on the previous year and up 49.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in Poland peaked at 98.0% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 65.1%, in 2006.
Poland ranks 3rd of 36 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social in Poland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 65.2% | — |
| 2006 | 65.1% | -0.2% |
| 2007 | 66.7% | +2.5% |
| 2008 | 67.8% | +1.6% |
| 2009 | 65.8% | -3.0% |
| 2010 | 70.0% | +6.5% |
| 2011 | 69.4% | -0.9% |
| 2012 | 66.1% | -4.7% |
| 2015 | 72.8% | +10.2% |
| 2016 | 71.8% | -1.4% |
| 2017 | 69.6% | -3.0% |
| 2019 | 98.0% | +40.9% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 98.0% is above the median for high income countries, which is 39.7%, 2.5× the median. (6 countries reporting)
- Poland's 98.0% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 61.0%, 1.6× the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.1% | 65.1% | 67.8% | 5 |
| 2010s | 73.9% | 66.1% | 98.0% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in Poland?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in Poland was 98.0% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 98.0% in 2019.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 65.1% in 2006.
- How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Poland ranks 3rd out of 36 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 49.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group