Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social in Poland
Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social was 152.8% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in Poland stood at 152.8%. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 27.4% on the previous year and up 27.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in Poland peaked at 152.8% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 117.4%, in 2008.
That places Poland 2nd out of 37 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social in Poland, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 118.3% | — |
| 2006 | 119.8% | +1.3% |
| 2007 | 118.2% | -1.4% |
| 2008 | 117.4% | -0.6% |
| 2009 | 119.9% | +2.1% |
| 2010 | 123.1% | +2.6% |
| 2011 | 122.2% | -0.7% |
| 2012 | 122.1% | -0.0% |
| 2015 | 132.4% | +8.4% |
| 2016 | 128.8% | -2.7% |
| 2017 | 119.9% | -6.9% |
| 2019 | 152.8% | +27.4% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 152.8% is above the median for high income countries, which is 55.6%, 2.7× the median. (6 countries reporting)
- Poland's 152.8% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 93.6%, 1.6× the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 118.7% | 117.4% | 119.9% | 5 |
| 2010s | 128.7% | 119.9% | 152.8% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in Poland?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in Poland was 152.8% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 152.8% in 2019.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 117.4% in 2008.
- How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Poland ranks 2nd out of 37 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 27.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group